Do NOT permanently force this UI upon us. Some of us LIKE the current interface and it works *really* well for what we need to it do. We don't want to "get familiar" with a disaster of an interface. We want to use the "tried and true" interface that we are accustomed to. Use the group below as your second tier of beta testers and recognize that the users you have "extensively testing with for the last 12 months" are NOT representative of your real user base.
This is a case of "if it isn't broken, don't break it". The current UI is not broken. How about having the developers work on your disaster of a login process? Now THAT is currently broken and desperately has needed fixed for the last 2 years at least.
PAA Business Office supported this idea ·
Do NOT permanently force this UI upon us. Some of us LIKE the current interface and it works *really* well for what we need to it do. We don't want to "get familiar" with a disaster of an interface. We want to use the "tried and true" interface that we are accustomed to. Use the group below as your second tier of beta testers and recognize that the users you have "extensively testing with for the last 12 months" are NOT representative of your real user base.
This is a case of "if it isn't broken, don't break it". The current UI is not broken. How about having the developers work on your disaster of a login process? Now THAT is currently broken and desperately has needed fixed for the last 2 years at least.