Skip to content

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 661 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ting You commented  · 

    The motivation for the redesign is to put the "subscription required" stuff in our face, like putting the milk in the back of the grocery store. Before, Adobe Reader was friendly and free, now it's almost impossible to see what requires a subscription and what doesn't.

    I'm guessing Adobe already has numbers on how many clicks on "subscription only" features lead to subscriptions (it's simple metrics). If that's working for them, we free users may just be SOL. In the end, it makes sense (no free lunch). I can't tell enough people I know about the revert feature. It's like opting out of spam.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ting You commented  · 

    This is a fine example of ensh*ttification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification -- I suspect if we don't pay, we'll be subject to the pain.

    Ting You supported this idea  ·