Settings and activity
3 results found
-
1 vote
Alex Ion shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Your concerns about the changed behavior in Acrobat's Output Preview panel are valid, and it does seem like a significant shift from the previous functionality. Here are some key points regarding your issue:
Expected Behavior (Prior Versions)
Previously, when switching the Simulation Profile in Output Preview, Acrobat would simulate how the existing ink values would appear in another printing condition, without altering the ink breakdown itself. This aligns with the intended purpose of a soft proof—showing how a given set of CMYK values would visually render in different environments.Current Behavior (2024 Version)
Now, when switching the Simulation Profile, the ink values themselves change while the on-screen appearance remains the same. This suggests that Acrobat is now converting colors instead of merely simulating them like—similar to how "Convert to Profile" works in Photoshop, rather than "Assign Profile."Impact on Prepress and Printing Workflows https://wordscramble.eu/
This new behavior disrupts workflows where the integrity of ink values is critical. Many printers do not apply color-managed conversions to PDFs, relying instead on the supplied CMYK numbers. If Acrobat changes those values when previewing a different profile, it introduces confusion and potential errors in prepress preparation.Possible Workarounds
Check if there's a hidden preference or toggle in Acrobat’s color management settings that allows reverting to the old behavior.
If your team relies on the previous functionality, consider reaching out to Adobe Support or the community forums to verify if this change was intentional or a bug.
If an older version is available elsewhere, testing the behavior side-by-side could confirm whether this shift happened in a recent update.
Is This the Mandela Effect?
Unlikely. Your description aligns with how Output Preview has traditionally worked. This change, if intentional, could be Adobe aligning Acrobat’s behavior with other Creative Cloud apps—but it seems like a misstep for users who rely on true soft-proofing.Next Steps
It would be useful to get confirmation from other prepress professionals or Adobe representatives. If this is a new feature rather than a bug, Adobe should provide an option to revert to the previous method. A formal feature request or bug report may be necessary if this impacts production workflows significantly.
Improving Adobe, particularly in areas like Acrobat, Photoshop, InDesign, and other Creative Cloud apps, requires a mix of usability enhancements, performance optimizations, and better communication with users. Here are some key areas of improvement:
1. User Experience & Workflow Enhancements
More Customization Options: Allow users to toggle between older and newer behaviors (e.g., the Output Preview Simulation Profile issue).
Better UI Consistency: Some Adobe apps (e.g., Photoshop and Illustrator) have different approaches to similar tasks—standardizing interactions would help.
Improved Default Settings: Many users find Adobe’s default preferences suboptimal for professional workflows. Providing better presets or "workflow modes" could help.
Intelligent Auto-Save & Crash Recovery: While Adobe apps have auto-save, they could improve background saving and instant recovery (similar to Figma).
2. Performance & Stability
Reduce Bloat & Optimize Performance: Adobe apps often feel heavy, especially Acrobat and Photoshop. More efficient memory management and leaner updates would improve speed.
Faster Load Times & Startup Optimization: Some apps take too long to launch; a “light mode” for quick edits would be useful.
Better GPU Acceleration Utilization: Improve rendering performance, especially in After Effects and Illustrator, to better leverage modern GPUs.
3. Better Collaboration & Cloud Integration
Seamless Version Control: Improve Adobe Cloud collaboration with Git-like version tracking for files.
Live Collaboration (Like Figma): Adobe has started integrating real-time editing (e.g., Photoshop Beta), but expanding this to Illustrator and InDesign would be a game-changer.
Cross-App Synchronization: More seamless movement between Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, and After Effects without performance drops.
4. Fixing Long-Standing Bugs & Issues https://run1.onl/
Addressing User-Reported Issues Faster: Some long-standing issues (like color management inconsistencies) have been ignored for years. Prioritizing them would improve user trust.
More Transparent Patch Notes: Clearly state what’s fixed or changed in updates.
5. Pricing & Subscription Improvements
More Flexible Subscription Models: Offer app-specific plans at lower prices, especially for users who only need Photoshop or Illustrator.
Perpetual License Options: Some users still want one-time purchases—perhaps a hybrid model could work.
6. AI & Automation Enhancements
More Intelligent Auto-Features: Adobe Firefly AI is a great start, but expanding AI-powered auto-masking, auto-layout, and retouching tools would be beneficial.
AI-Based Troubleshooting: If Adobe apps detect workflow inefficiencies (e.g., large file size issues in InDesign), they could suggest optimization tips.
7. Community Engagement & Support
Better Customer Support: Adobe’s support can be slow and frustrating. Improving response times and direct access to developers for bug reports would help.
User-Driven Development: Adobe should involve users in beta testing and feedback more actively, implementing features that professionals actually request.
Would you like suggestions for a specific Adobe app?