I can see why this would be an issue. Reusing identical field names across multiple forms is fairly common, but once those forms are merged, the linked-field behavior can create a lot of unnecessary work. What seems like a helpful automation quickly becomes a headache when each section is supposed to contain different information. A simple setting to keep fields independent during the merge process would make the feature far more practical.
Until then, the only reliable workaround is usually to rename, flatten, or modify the fields before combining the files. For users who regularly handle digital paperwork, https://camscanner-modapk.com/ can be helpful for organizing, reviewing, and preparing PDF documents before they are merged. It would be great to see a future update give users more control over how form fields are handled.
I can see why this would be an issue. Reusing identical field names across multiple forms is fairly common, but once those forms are merged, the linked-field behavior can create a lot of unnecessary work. What seems like a helpful automation quickly becomes a headache when each section is supposed to contain different information. A simple setting to keep fields independent during the merge process would make the feature far more practical.
Until then, the only reliable workaround is usually to rename, flatten, or modify the fields before combining the files. For users who regularly handle digital paperwork, https://camscanner-modapk.com/ can be helpful for organizing, reviewing, and preparing PDF documents before they are merged. It would be great to see a future update give users more control over how form fields are handled.