I am attempting to generate PDFs which are considered accessible using Python.

I am checking their Accessibility in Acrobat and getting what I think spurious warnings with regards to the title tag.

The XML packet before the acrobat "fix" looks like this:
```
<?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 9.1-c001 79.2a0d8d9, 2023/03/14-11:19:46 ">
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/" xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/" rdf:about="">
<dc:format>application/pdf/dc:format
<dc:title>
<rdf:Alt>
<rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">Vendor Report: VENDOR/rdf:li
/rdf:Alt
/dc:title
<xmp:ModifyDate>2023-05-26T12:54:04-04:00/xmp:ModifyDate
<xmp:CreateDate>2023-05-26T12:28:56-04:00/xmp:CreateDate
<xmp:MetadataDate>2023-05-26T12:54:04-04:00/xmp:MetadataDate
<xmpMM:DocumentID>uuid:befe056c-5bfe-4c4d-9d90-0d6b1d008200/xmpMM:DocumentID
<xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:328eb639-0111-ac4b-a9ba-a39da14175e0/xmpMM:InstanceID
/rdf:Description
/rdf:RDF
/x:xmpmeta

<?xpacket end="w"?>
```

The XML packet after the acrobat "fix" looks like this:
```
<?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 9.1-c001 79.2a0d8d9, 2023/03/14-11:19:46 ">
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about=""
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/"
xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/">
<dc:format>application/pdf/dc:format
<dc:title>
<rdf:Alt>
<rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">Vendor Report: VENDOR/rdf:li
/rdf:Alt
/dc:title
<xmp:ModifyDate>2023-05-26T12:54:04-04:00/xmp:ModifyDate
<xmp:CreateDate>2023-05-26T12:28:56-04:00/xmp:CreateDate
<xmp:MetadataDate>2023-05-26T12:54:04-04:00/xmp:MetadataDate
<xmpMM:DocumentID>uuid:befe056c-5bfe-4c4d-9d90-0d6b1d008200/xmpMM:DocumentID
<xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:328eb639-0111-ac4b-a9ba-a39da14175e0/xmpMM:InstanceID
/rdf:Description
/rdf:RDF
/x:xmpmeta

<?xpacket end="w"?>
```

I believe the only differences in the two xmls is the spacing which in this case is just an artifact. It should not be the basis for declaring the first file not tagged properly.