User has a Citrix virtual desktop with a USB HP printer connected to a Thin Client, and redirected into the Citrix desktop using the Citrix Universal Printer.
Prior to this version, opening a PDF and printing to that redirected printer presented no problem. On this most recent version it does with a quick "The document could not be printed" error and then it spits out a blank page.
Ideally I'd like to get my hands on 20.005.20058 to verify this, but I cannot find the full download now. I have however installed an older version 15.*** and this prints just fine. This to me is pointing to a potential bug in this most recent version, since the user was able to print just fine before on the previous version, updated to the latest on his machine 6 days ago.
How can we go about troubleshooting this further as this appears to be a bug. How can I get my hands on a recent previous version of Adobe to verify that it's this specific version?

When users are printing with acrobat reader then the Arial font is getting substituted by a Z@XXXXX tmp font which is located in C:\Users\xxxxxxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp\acrord32_sbx.
Our oracle JDE application is referring to a font family with Arial as leading one and this will finally give weird characters in our JDE screens.
We would like development team of Adobe to verify why those temp fonts are left behind because they are locked and we can not delete them. Only a restart of the pc will disconnect the temp font and then we will be able to delete them.
Some articles were pointing to the font cache file but removing that is not helping either.

There is a button in Adobe Acrobat Pro that allows toggling thin line weights as shown on the screen on and off but there is now way to get the document to print with thin lines. This is true of both PDF and physical printers. This can make working with and sharing readable engineered drawings difficult. Please follow up on this regardless of vote count! If you need to gauge interest in this request you should search "how to print thin lines in Adobe Acrobat" and easily see that this improvement would be widely appreciated. Adobe has obviously realized the value of being able to view documents with their intended line weights, hence the existence of the toggle button. Now just make the print function use the current state of the existing line weight toggle button to decide how to print the line weights! Just like good ol' WYSIWYG ! It is obvious that relatively few users take the time to access or even know about the existence of this feature request page. Even if they did the functionality for searching for previous requests that match your own is not very effective so how to you expect important request to gather votes? Thank you for your attention to this critical feature update. Please help make the costly Acrobat Pro the only PDF software I need to accomplish my tasks.

Factsheets, whitepapers, etc. often have a lot of brand colours in them. In the case of the company I work for, we have a dark blue front and end page which results in the use of a lot of ink when printing which is environmentally unfriendly.

Wouldn't it be a great idea to be able to overrule this branding for printing?

I guess this can be done using AI searching pdfs for dark backgrounds and white letters. and making the letters dark and backgrounds white so you can print environmental friendly.

The best option would be to enforce this as a designer so this aligns with your corporate social responsibility, but it would also be nice to have this option as the end-user.

Since so many folks work at home with the usual 8 1/2x11 format printers, it's hard to print PDFs that are in 17x11 & 34x22 format. This includes the engineering, survey, Departments of Transportation drawings, maybe architects, and many others, like schedules and Gantt charts. We work with SCALE drawings and we'd sometimes like to print our usual landscape prints from the at-scale drawing format in 34x22 or 17x11 onto TWO 11x 8 1/2 prints, effectively splitting the drawing in two, down the middle. If we could get full-bleed, edge to edge, so much the better. This allows us to see drawings in sufficient detail and be able to scale. Normally, 17x11 (ANSI B) format is already a half-size ANSI D format, so just scaling it down to ANSI A (letter size) is too small to see enough detail.
Also, because we use ANSI D prints and PDFs, it would be nice to print directly to two ANSI A size prints.
In summary, quick-print from either ANSI D or it's half-size ANSI B directly to two ANSI A prints, splitting the images in half, keeping their scalability secured and into a very common at-home format.