12134 results found

1. Change default lookup link for selected word definitions in Acrobat Pro and Reader

   Currently the default lookup reference for word definitions in Acrobat is dictionary.com, an inadequate resource for a great many word definitions. There should be a setting to change this default to another URL of the user's choice. Some examples, but not exclusively, that are significantly better than the current choice would be merriamwebster.com or oxforddictionaries.com

   44 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   22 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. EDit PDF popup

   Each time I open a pdf document sent to me by my publishers, a pop-up dialbox comes saying EDIT PDF with the option ADD I don;t want this; besides, it costs money, I'm broke. How can I get rid of this unsolicited horesment? no unsubscribe!

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing PDFs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. A document where images cannot be screenshot to be searched for on google images or way to alter our images so same images don't come up

   I need to be able to create a document where the images we include can not be screenshot and the searched for in google image search (thus enabling the person I am sending the PDF to to go to competitor websites who have the same images as us). So either no screenshot allowed or the ability to change the images we have sufficiently that google image will not find it.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. UI Scaling on Surface Pro needs attention

   I am using Adobe Acrobat on a Surface Pro 2. The scaling is horrible, with dialog boxes too big for the screen and options inaccessible. I gather the height of the Surface Screen is not within your specification. Please can you enhance the dialog boxex so they display fully on the screen. I also use Captivate and this is fine. Dialog boxes display properly.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  User Interface  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Resolved  ·  AdminAyush Jain (Lead Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

   Hi,

   Since we haven’t got further updates from you on this. We are closing this issue for now.
   Please reach out to us again if you have further concerns

   Thanks
   Ayush

5. Allow for customizability of text snippets in advanced search results

   Summary of the Problems: Search result snippets in an Advanced Search are often uninformative due to two distinct problems.

   Problem 1. The length of text snippet in each search result is too short.
   Problem 2. The search term occurs too "early" in the result snippet (that is, the term you searched for is the first or second word in the snippet--you see nothing that came before your term, which is often what you needed to know).

   Solution to Problem 1: allow the user the ability to customize the maximum size of snippets returned with search results. We have huge monitors nowadays; we can make the advanced search window itself huge; why not allow for the ability to make the search result snippets really long, too? Or at least longer than they are now?

   Solution to Problem 2: allow the user to customize where the search term occurs within the result snippet. For instance, this could be a finely-grained preference, such as "Search result should be returned with X number of characters/words before/after it" where X is some user-entered number. Or there could be just a coarsely-grained preference, such as, "Search term should occur at the beginning/middle/end of the snippet."

   Reason these are needed: often, a snippet is informative only if you have a certain amount of surrounding text, or only if you know a certain amount of text that comes before and after the term you searched. Presently, however, the search term occurs as the very first, or sometimes second, word of the snippet result. If you wanted to know what came before your search term in order to judge the relevance of a particular search hit, the snippet becomes unhelpful. In such cases, you have no other option but to click over to the document to get your context and then back to your search window to jump to the next result. But then, if you do that, it negates the point of having that result snippet. Such clicking back and forth between search result window and document window might not sound like much, but when your search results number in the hundreds, this clicking-back-and-forth procedure makes your work very inefficient; in a large publishing or indexing project, you might need to perform thousands of advanced searches, each with dozens or hundreds of hits. In such situations, the time-saving potential of implementing this request becomes apparent.

   Summary of the Problems: Search result snippets in an Advanced Search are often uninformative due to two distinct problems.

   Problem 1. The length of text snippet in each search result is too short.
   Problem 2. The search term occurs too "early" in the result snippet (that is, the term you searched for is the first or second word in the snippet--you see nothing that came before your term, which is often what you needed to know).

   Solution to Problem 1: allow the user the ability to customize the maximum size of snippets returned with search results. We have huge monitors… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Show page numbers in advanced search results

   Problem: When doing an Advanced Search, in order to find out the page number of any given search result, you must hover the pointer over each individual search hit and wait for a popup of its page number to appear.

   Feature request: Show the page numbers on which those hits occur, and preferably in a column to the left of each search hit.

   Reason it's needed: This would save a tremendous amount of time for certain labor intensive tasks, for instance, manually indexing a book. To elaborate a bit: When manually indexing a large book (say, 500 pages), you regularly need to index terms that have a couple hundred occurrences. Currently, when confronted with such a large list, you either (1) have to hover over each entry individually to find its page number or (2) you have to click on the entry and watch where the document jumps to. Neither of these is very efficient. It would be far more efficient if you could just see the page numbers at a glance to the side of the search results. This would let you see at a glance that, for instance, the next 50 occurrences of a given index keyword occur over, say, just 6 consecutive pages. This would let you make short work of a large list--you would just take note of the page the range and move on, thereby saving you the time of having to hover over or click on those 50 entries (or some significant portion thereof).

   Problem: When doing an Advanced Search, in order to find out the page number of any given search result, you must hover the pointer over each individual search hit and wait for a popup of its page number to appear.

   Feature request: Show the page numbers on which those hits occur, and preferably in a column to the left of each search hit.

   Reason it's needed: This would save a tremendous amount of time for certain labor intensive tasks, for instance, manually indexing a book. To elaborate a bit: When manually indexing a large book (say, 500 pages), you regularly… more

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Under review  ·  Vivek Chandra responded

   Hi Tim

   We have shared your concern with the team and we will look into this.
   Sorry for the inconvenience!

   Regards
   Vivek

7. Headers and footers should use document's page labels instead of inventing page labels

   I want to suggest an improvement to Acrobat Professional:

   When adding headers or footers to a document, I suggest that the mechanism use the document's page numbers, instead of inventing its own.

   For example, my document has page numbers A.1 through A.29 followed by B.1 through B.7 followed by C.1 through C.6 ... followed by V.1 through V.11.

   Right now, it seems that the only way I can get the actual page numbers to accurately appear in the footer is Add 22 different footers. That's an onerous task.

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Editing PDFs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. continuous page scrolling

   Need pages to continuously scroll and not jump one to the next.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Resolved  ·  2 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Trying to register my legal copy of Acrobat DC Pro

   Trying to register my legal copy of Acrobat DC Pro

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Installation and Licensing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Resolved  ·  Adminahusain (Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

   Marking this issue as resolved as there is no response from the user.

10. Need a way to circle text in red and put a note for editing

    Need a way to circle text in red and put a note for editing

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Resolved  ·  1 comment  ·  Commenting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Acrobat combine files + Batch compare pdf + Clarify array object error

    If you want supporting screen shots or more detail, please contact me.
    Jyotika at Acrobat Help adchelp@adobe.com has my eMail and tele#

    1. Combine files into a Binder always FORCES the default to be filename sequence.
       The User should NOT be forced to move HUNDREDS of files in a large document
       just to get them in the proper sequence.

       Yes, there is the "Move Up/Down" option which works on each file ONE AT A TIME.
       However, has anyone on the Acrobat team actually tried to do that to resequence
       over 1,000 pages into an absolutely different non-alpha result??? THINK DAYS !!!!

      - If the files are in different folders, it ignores the folder structure, even if 
        WINDOWS EXPLORER is sorted to list the files in folder/filename sequence 
        [See Example #1 at the end.]
    
      * >>>>> Using different tools, I've finally been able to achieve the desired result! 
          I've combined over 1,000 pages coming from DIFFERENT folders  
          and subfolders so that the final Binder is true to actual file sequence in 
         each of the original folders (including their respective subfolders). <<<<<
    

    1. "Expected an array object" error when comparing 2 pdf's
       • Indicate which page/pages has/have error
       • It is almost IMPOSSIBLE to find the "cause(s) in a 3,000 page document

      - Worst of all, the document seems to be correct during most steps. 
         During several steps, it can be searched and put into a binder.  
         Suddenly, seemingly out of nowhere, this error occurs and all 
         subsequents tasks cannot be run!   
    
      - A compare of the document is NOT possible. See "Docu Processing"
    
      >>>>>> I found this is the Acrobat archive: 
      value at index 0 must be an indirect object
      "Closing this request, As there is no plan to fix this bugs in Acrobat XI."
    
     >>>>>>>>>  Another report says  "This error unfortunately comes up for us a lot which I guess is to be somewhat expected when combining hundreds of PDFs from various sources. I'm assuming not every PDF generator follows exact PDF standards; iPhones, bank websites, 3rd party PDF printers, etc. However these PDFs were all combined with Acrobat Pro DC. Meaning that Acrobat Pro DC is not checking the PDFs or sanitising the data when they are imported! But that is another subject for another day... 
    

    The problem we have is that the error message(s) don't even tell us on which page it encountered the error. So we are left scratching out heads wondering which page or which part of the 10,000 page document has the problem. ...... Ok so hold on because this gets better... So to attempt to repair the document(s) we try and split them into smaller documents using Organise Pages > Split > say 100 pages or 1000 pages per "Part"
    Then we get the error: "An incorrect structure was found in the PDF." "

    1. Compare numerous pdf's in batch-type logic and determine if they are identical. Better yet, simultaneously allow the User to place the identical ones. in the Recycle Bin.

     - As verified by tech support, it is only possible to compare one 
       pdf with another. Because of the way Acrobat works, a minor 
       change not related to the content will never match as per any 
       and all of the available compare programs. 
    
       >>>>> For example, open MyTest.pdf. Save as 123.pdf and 
                    save again as 456.pdf.    Do NOT make any changes! 
    
                    Looking at KB-size, the documents will seem identical, 
                    but they will in fact differ by 1 to 3 bytes in size. 
    
     - Basically, because the filename is stored somewhere in the
       document, the 3 pdf's will NEVER compare as "EQUAL", unless 
       they are reviewed in a tedious, manual, multi-step manner. 
    
     - Yes: Acrobat's Tools > Compare  pdf#1 with pdf#2  
        will "reveal" that the content is identical. 
    
      - Now consider the nightmare of trying to "cull" old backups 
        or various attempts to "combine" ....... and you can see that 
        MONTHS would be required. 
    
      - I have purchased several compare packages. They work fine 
        on many file types,  but they absolutely CANNOT handle 
        batch pdf compares!
    
     - Think of charging 
             (just  $25 for such a tool)   x
             (the millions of worldwide Acrobat Users)   x 
             (only 20% purchased)    = 
       LOTS AND LOTS of profit for Adobe !!!!!!!!!!!!
    

    1. It seems that various financial institutions etc have
       different ways of INTERNALLY storing the contents of
       a pdf. Specifically, FONTS are not FONTS. That means
       that documents when printed look 100% alike, but
       when electronically compared, the FONTS and similar
       information causes havoc.

       Adobe is the leader in pdf creation.

       There is a need to batch compare or batch redact
       without the nightmare of font-like hidden elements.

    2. Protection > Redaction could also be greatly improved
       to make life easier for the user:

       Global redact in this document:

       From "text 1234567" to "text 12...67"

       From Medicare xxxx-xx-xxxxA to Medicare xxxx-xx-xxxx.
       (Remove only the last letter of the longer text).

    Example #1 (To achieve max chaos, use 50 folders each with 50 subfolders)

       Folder 1      1
                             7
                             x
                             y
                             z 
    
       Folder 2      1
                             9
                             a
                             b
                             c
    

    • Use Windows Explorer to search for *.pdf and sequence by folder.
    • Windows properly lists 1-7-x-y-z followed by 1-9-a-b-c
    • Block copy the above and right click in that sequece to "combine"
    • No matter how hard you try, the Binder has 1-1-7-9-a-b-c-x-y-z
    • Yes, it bunches the 1's !!!!!
    • Repeat the test with 1,000 different filenames and sequence using MOVE UP .... and collapse from exhaustion!

    This still does not work
    "Compare Documents - Please add an option or setting to the compare document feature so that shifts in paragraphs of unchanged text are not marked as changes. ... Currently it shows as a text delete and then a text insert on the following page.

    Batch processing to Actions in Acrobat DC HOW?!?!?
    Can you provide a "plain English" description on how to create a "batch processing" type Action that can be use on multiple files at once? I have hundreds of files that I need to set open options on and add specific bookmarks to. Trying to do this one at a time is NOT happening. Urgent please!

    If you check the internet, there are literally hundreds of people who really need these features.
    As the market standard, Adobe would help it Users if these features were implemented.

    Sincerely,

    Inge

    PS Special thanks to Jyotika at Acrobat Help adchelp@adobe.com

    If you want supporting screen shots or more detail, please contact me.
    Jyotika at Acrobat Help adchelp@adobe.com has my eMail and tele#

    1. Combine files into a Binder always FORCES the default to be filename sequence.
       The User should NOT be forced to move HUNDREDS of files in a large document
       just to get them in the proper sequence.

       Yes, there is the "Move Up/Down" option which works on each file ONE AT A TIME.
       However, has anyone on the Acrobat team actually tried to do that to resequence
       over 1,000 pages into an absolutely different non-alpha result??? THINK DAYS !!!!

    … more
    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Under review  ·  AdminAakash Deep (Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

    Hi,

    Regrading your Batch Compare PDF query: Currently we don’t support batch comparison in Acrobat but this in our backlog. We’ll update youwhence it’ll get prioritized and impelemented at our end.

    Thanks,
    Adobe Acrobat DC Team

12. redaction

    When saving a redacted file, the option to for "redacted" to NOT be added to the end of the file name.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Newest update of Adobe Acrobat DC making every document open full screen is terrible.

    Newest update of Adobe Acrobat DC making every document open full screen is terrible.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Resolved  ·  Amboo Srivastava responded

    Issue resolved with latest update.

14. Allow Action Wizard to "Close" files

    The feature was available on early versions which made batch processing easier. I believe it allowed the user to Execute a Menu Item. Please bring it back. The javascript work arounds all seem to have their own little issues.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. An error occurred while trying to create a mail document. Adobe Acrobat is unable to complete your request.

    An error occurred while trying to create a mail document. Adobe Acrobat is unable to complete your request.
    --this is the error message coming ups when i try to email pdf doc opened within Adobe PRO Dc program

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Adobe Standard XI huge downgrade

    I had Adobe Pro 9. I used it at work to add stamps, and markup drawings. My machine was rebuilt and Adobe Standard XI was loaded. Very inefficient software for what I need. I searched for the comparison to XI Pro and am not convinced it is any better.
    Some issues: preloaded stamps cannot be removed, each stamp has to be selected every time (9 would remember the last used), you cannot copy multiple objects using the control button, you cannot save a custom sheet sized when printing (previously you could, issue of width/length for some sizes being backwards still exists. Reader deals with it well, other software does not. Adds rotation to the file.), very difficult to manage menus in the upper ribbon. I clicked to get the instructions and was sent to a YouTube video of "enhancements" that did not relate to my issues. Not helpful at all. I would love to upgrade to 9, but it is not available to me. Trying to decide which was the biggest downgrade I have seen. PTC's Wildfire 4 to CreoP 1, Microsofts Vista, or this. From comments below, they may also be in the running.

    I had Adobe Pro 9. I used it at work to add stamps, and markup drawings. My machine was rebuilt and Adobe Standard XI was loaded. Very inefficient software for what I need. I searched for the comparison to XI Pro and am not convinced it is any better.
    Some issues: preloaded stamps cannot be removed, each stamp has to be selected every time (9 would remember the last used), you cannot copy multiple objects using the control button, you cannot save a custom sheet sized when printing (previously you could, issue of width/length for some sizes being backwards still… more

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Commenting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Combine Files should sort the file names with numbers numerically not alphabetically

    When I use the Combine Files feature with files named with numbers, they are sorted alphabetically rather than numerically.
    For example, instead of getting a file sorted:
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, etc.
    I get this sorting:
    1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 20, 21, 22, 3, 30, 31, etc.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Creating PDFs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Resolved  ·  AdminTanvi Rastogi (Lead Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

    Hi Michael

    Can you try changing the View to Thumbnail View instead of List View while doing Combine?
    In that view, you can select multiple files, drag and drop files or reorder as per your need.

    Thanks
    Tanvi

18. Bug: Unable to Open a pdf while mid-saving another.

    Problem: I am unable to open a pdf (from hard drive i.e. desktop) while I am in the 'save as' menu for another pdf file.

    Reproduce:
    1. Opened an pdf from Microsoft Outlook.
    2. Went to file > "save as'
    3. Used windows explorer to open another pdf that was saved on windows cloud storage.
    4. Unable to open second pdf file.

    Environment: Windows 7; Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 04581.

    Expected Result: I should be able to open the second pdf file

    Observed result: Unable to open second pdf file

    Bonus: Results occurred once I was out of the 'save as' menu.

    Problem: I am unable to open a pdf (from hard drive i.e. desktop) while I am in the 'save as' menu for another pdf file.

    Reproduce:
    1. Opened an pdf from Microsoft Outlook.
    2. Went to file > "save as'
    3. Used windows explorer to open another pdf that was saved on windows cloud storage.
    4. Unable to open second pdf file.

    Environment: Windows 7; Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 04581.

    Expected Result: I should be able to open the second pdf file

    Observed result: Unable to open second pdf file

    Bonus: Results occurred once I was out of the 'save… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. PDF Initial View Magnification Guidelines

    Why doesn't Adobe set the default initial view magnification setting to "fit page" so a viewer can see an entire document upon initial view? As a seasoned graphic designer, I believe it is much more courteous to allow the viewer to orient themselves to an entire document and then allow then to zoom in for more detail. It is disconcerting to see a partial document when opening a PDF file. Adobe is a leader in accessibility standards and I wondered if you had insight into this topic, I don't see a recommended initial view magnification in the WCAG 2.0 AA standard but I have found references that state that the "page fit" works better for some screen readers when they read a PDF. I'm seeking a "best practice" guideline. Please respond at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

    Why doesn't Adobe set the default initial view magnification setting to "fit page" so a viewer can see an entire document upon initial view? As a seasoned graphic designer, I believe it is much more courteous to allow the viewer to orient themselves to an entire document and then allow then to zoom in for more detail. It is disconcerting to see a partial document when opening a PDF file. Adobe is a leader in accessibility standards and I wondered if you had insight into this topic, I don't see a recommended initial view magnification in the WCAG 2.0 AA… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Accessibility  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Resolved  ·  AdminRachit Jain (Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

    Hi,
    Since I haven’t heard from you, I believe the issue is resolved on your side.
    Feel free to contact us anytime.

    Thanks
    Rachit

20. Subscription & activation system is very very poor - wasted most of today with it

    I have a fully paid subscription with correct Visa card details - keeps telling me the TRIAL MODE has expired - logged in, logged out a million times - useless, absolutely useless - should get a refund to cover lost salary

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Installation and Licensing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Resolved  ·  Adminahusain (Software Engineer, Adobe) responded

    Marking this issue as resolved as there is no response from the user.