- or
14299 results found
-
Duplicating tags
The process for creating an accurate and PDF/UA proficient structure for example a list involves <L> -> <Li> -> <Lbl>, <LBody>. This is for ONE list item and a list rarely consist of just one list item so the three tags have to be created for each one. To get these items you need to right click, choose List item, click OK, right click choose Label, click OK, right click choose List item body, click OK, drag and drop List item body into <Li> and then drag and drop <LBody> into <Li>. This is just for the structure, then you also have to fill all tags with the correct data. Creating a single list item can take well over a minute. The time it takes in its inefficiency is one issue I have with this, but primarily it bugs me how incredibly tedious this is, and how stupid the Acrobat app seems to do what it's designed to. I see you did have a ticket for copy + paste of tags back in 2020, and that you "had your eyes on it" or something like that. Apparently absolutely nothing has happened in this area and truth be told I'm quite confident nothing will happen after me pointing it out yet again. But hey, "hope", am I right?
The process for creating an accurate and PDF/UA proficient structure for example a list involves <L> -> <Li> -> <Lbl>, <LBody>. This is for ONE list item and a list rarely consist of just one list item so the three tags have to be created for each one. To get these items you need to right click, choose List item, click OK, right click choose Label, click OK, right click choose List item body, click OK, drag and drop List item body into <Li> and then drag and drop <LBody> into <Li>. This is just for the structure, then you…
4 votes -
Problem with PKCS#7 signatures when using a Windows Digital ID (CSP)
We are writing to report a bug we have identified in Adobe Acrobat related to PKCS#7 digital signatures when signing without attaching the revocation status via CSP.
Issue Summary
When creating a PKCS#7 signature without adding the revocation status, the resulting signature is invalid.
Root Cause Analysis
After thorough investigation, we believe the issue originates in Adobe Acrobat's handling of the CSP calls. We logged that the function CPSetHashParam is called 63 times during the signing process, and an incorrect hash from the file is being passed. This results in an invalid signature being produced.
Workaround
We have identified that the issue does not occur when either of the following conditions is met:
- The default signature format is set to CAdES, or
- Adding the revocation status is enabled.
In both cases, CPSetHashParam is called only once, and the signature is produced correctly.
Steps to Reproduce
1. Configure Adobe Acrobat to use PKCS#7 as the default signature format.
2. Disable adding the revocation status.
3. Sign a document using a CSP-based certificate.
4. Observe that CPSetHashParam is invoked 63 times and the resulting signature is invalid.
Expected Behavior
CPSetHashParam should be called only once with the correct file hash, and the signature should be valid.
Environment
- Windows Adobe Acrobat (64-bit) 26.001.21563
- Signature format: PKCS#7
- Revocation status: not embedded
- Signing method: CSP (Cryptographic Service Provider)
We kindly ask you to investigate this issue and provide a fix or guidance at your earliest convenience. Please let us know if you require any additional logs or information.We are writing to report a bug we have identified in Adobe Acrobat related to PKCS#7 digital signatures when signing without attaching the revocation status via CSP.
Issue Summary
When creating a PKCS#7 signature without adding the revocation status, the resulting signature is invalid.
Root Cause Analysis
After thorough investigation, we believe the issue originates in Adobe Acrobat's handling of the CSP calls. We logged that the function CPSetHashParam is called 63 times during the signing process, and an incorrect hash from the file is being passed. This results in an invalid signature being produced.
Workaround
We have identified that…4 votes -
Allow Setting to keep on the same location of the page when moving between pages
Allow Setting to keep on the same location of the page when moving between pages. This function is so important for review of large drawings, particular useful and very critical in design industry and construction industry with many design and work drawing, similar function have been adopted in other PDF viewing software to facilitate browsing between pages on the same location of the pages.
7 votes -
BUG FIX PLEASE - I'm no longer able to "select all" when using "Take a snapshot" function since last update
I used to be able to "select all" when taking a snapshot. Now this option is not available when using it.
I have to save it as an image file now to select and copy the whole image. Very time-consuming as I do this very often.
Please restore the ability to "select all" when taking a snapshot!
1 vote -
Get the "Pdf space" nonsense out of my workflow
As part of my work, I very frequently have to combine multiple pdfs into a single document. This used to be a straightforward, one-click action. Now I have to navigate a dropdown menu every single time to confirm that I want my combined pdfs to become a combined pdf. I do not want to "create an AI workspace and gain insights" and never will. This useless, tacked-on feature is making the basic functionality of your program worse.
2 votes -
AI is ruining Adobe
I get so many AI prompts that I am ready to cancel my entire companies subscription and switch to Foxit. Even when I select "no", they are incessant - all day, every day. They are ruining a product I used to really enjoy.
Maybe use AI to figure out how to add the option for AI into your program, but once a user declines it, it STOPS ASKING.2 votes -
Get rid of the stupid "Summarise your PDF Quickly" that pops up EVERYTIME I start Adobe
This is idiotic and invasive. It pops up even if I open a one page form that clearly cannot be summarised and there would be zero point in summarising it. If your dumba5s AI cannot tell when it is not needed, why the **** would l use it?
Pop ups that cannot be turned off are completely unacceptable. If I had any other choice, I would be quitting Adobe.
Paperclip anyone?
2 votes -
Acrobat Pro prevents Windows 10 from Sleeping or Hibernating
Adobe Acrobat (version 2026.001.21789) is preventing Windows 10 from sleeping or hibernating, regardless of how it is launched. Sleep is not re-enabled until Acrobat is exited.
Additional diagnostic information is below. Here are the results from a powercfg /requests command showing the process which is preventing sleep. These processes disappear from this list after Acrobat is closed.
PS C:\Windows\system32> powercfg /requests
DISPLAY:
[PROCESS] \Device\HarddiskVolume7\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\EdgeWebView\Application\151.0.4129.78\msedgewebview2.exe
Video Wake LockSYSTEM:
[PROCESS] \Device\HarddiskVolume7\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\EdgeWebView\Application\151.0.4129.78\msedgewebview2.exe
Video Wake LockAWAYMODE:
None.EXECUTION:
None.PERFBOOST:
None.ACTIVELOCKSCREEN:
None.2 votes -
Text Box not working after June 2026 update
When trying to add text to a pdf the box will appear; but, when typing in a word the cursor will move; but, no characters appear.
3 votes -
Better Customer Service
I just got off the phone with a customer service representative that was more than willing to cancel my services rather than give me a discount that I asked for since I've been getting billed annually back in 2018. It certainly does not pay to be a long time subscriber so I'll be using one of the many free services that are available online now. Update: After another call to customer support per their request I was given options for stated discounts available. Finding None. Upon telling the representative that there were no discounts she gave me a direct phone number to call and get said discounts. Guess what. She either gave me the wrong number intentionally or inadvertently.
I just got off the phone with a customer service representative that was more than willing to cancel my services rather than give me a discount that I asked for since I've been getting billed annually back in 2018. It certainly does not pay to be a long time subscriber so I'll be using one of the many free services that are available online now. Update: After another call to customer support per their request I was given options for stated discounts available. Finding None. Upon telling the representative that there were no discounts she gave me a direct phone…
2 votes -
Request esignatures function simply not working
Request e-signatures not working. I click it, enter the email address of the person I want to send it to, type the message, then hit next, and it does nothing. It just pops up the same window asking me to enter the email address of the recipient again.
2 votes -
Tabs duplicate in windows taskbar
Bug. I work with two monitors, and when I have the Adobe Acrobat window on one monitor, it shows as it should, but when I move the window to the other monitor the icons in the Windows taskbar multiplies, which get very annoying after just a few open dokuments. If I try to close a tab, the "duplicate" window in the taskbar is still there but empty. It has been like this for the last two updates of Acrobat I think. Please fix this error!
16 votes -
Mood Kharab Bc
Bakchodi on top
2 votes -
Kidda 22
Thik H K nhi 22 tu???
2 votes -
FILL AND SIGN NOT WORKING
Fill and sign not working
3 votes -
Confirmation Prompt for Auto-Tag Document and Right-Click Menu Improvements
Hi Team,
The Auto-Tag Document feature is highly valuable during the initial tagging phase, as it can generate a complete document structure in less than a minute.
However, our team primarily performs manual accessibility tagging to remediate PDF law reports. We manually tag more than 3,000 documents each month under tight SLAs. During this process, users frequently create page sections by right-clicking and selecting New Tag—often hundreds of times within a single document.
Issue
Because Auto-Tag Document appears close to New Tag in the right-click menu, users can accidentally select it while performing repetitive manual tagging work.When this occurs:
The auto-tagging process may overwrite or disrupt the existing manual tag structure.
Even if the user cancels the operation, previously completed manual tagging work can be lost or rendered unusable.
The action cannot be reversed using Ctrl + Z.
This creates a significant risk of lost effort, rework, and missed SLA deadlines.Requested Enhancements
We request the following improvements to Adobe Acrobat's Accessibility tagging workflow:Add a confirmation dialog before Auto-Tag Document runs
Display a clear warning that auto-tagging may replace or affect existing manual tags.
Provide explicit Confirm and Cancel options.
Ideally, include an option such as:
"Do not show this message again" for users who intentionally use Auto-Tag Document.
Rework the right-click menu placement for Auto-Tag DocumentRemove Auto-Tag Document from the right-click menu, as it is generally initiated from the Accessibility tools panel.
Alternatively, place it farther away from frequently used actions such as New Tag, or move it into a separate submenu or "Advanced Actions" section.
These changes would greatly improve usability and help prevent accidental loss of extensive manual accessibility remediation work.Thank you for considering this enhancement.
Hi Team,
The Auto-Tag Document feature is highly valuable during the initial tagging phase, as it can generate a complete document structure in less than a minute.
However, our team primarily performs manual accessibility tagging to remediate PDF law reports. We manually tag more than 3,000 documents each month under tight SLAs. During this process, users frequently create page sections by right-clicking and selecting New Tag—often hundreds of times within a single document.
Issue
Because Auto-Tag Document appears close to New Tag in the right-click menu, users can accidentally select it while performing repetitive manual tagging work.When this occurs:
…
1 vote -
Bug Report: Mixed Page-Size (Letter/Tabloid) PDFs Fail to Print via PostScript — Regression in Recent Acrobat/Reader Update
Summary
PDF documents containing mixed page sizes (8.5x11 and 11x17) fail to print correctly after a recent Acrobat/Reader update. Pages sized 11x17 fail with a PostScript interpreter error on the print device; the same 11x17 content prints successfully when extracted into its own single-size PDF. Rolling back Acrobat/Reader to a prior version on the affected server fully resolved the issue with no further errors.
Environment
Product: Adobe Acrobat / Acrobat Reader (please confirm exact product — Pro/Reader/DC — via Help > About)
Affected version: Believed to be 26.001.21771 (planned update dated Aug 1, 2026) — please confirm via Help > About on the affected machine before submitting
Last known-good version: Version installed prior to the Aug 2026 auto-update (please confirm exact build number)
Print target: Large-format industrial printer connected via an EFI Fiery print server (PostScript RIP)
Platform: Windows Server (print server / RDS host)
Steps to Reproduce
Open a PDF containing a mix of 8.5x11 and 11x17 pages in Acrobat/Reader.
Print the document to a PostScript-based printer/RIP with "Choose paper source by PDF page size" enabled (or equivalent mixed-media handling on the print device).
Observe print job failure specifically on 11x17 pages.Fix Confirmed
Uninstalling the current (post-update) version and rolling back Acrobat/Reader to the prior version on the print server resolved the issue completely — mixed-size jobs now print without error.
This strongly points to a regression introduced in the PostScript generation code path for mixed page-size documents in the recent update.
Additional Regression Observed: Missing Print Dialog Option
The print dialog in the updated version no longer shows the "Choose paper source by PDF page size" option that was present in the prior version. This option is what allows Acrobat to correctly switch trays/page geometry per page for mixed-size documents, so its disappearance is likely directly related to the mixed-media printing failure described above rather than a separate, unrelated issue.
Additional Notes
The issue began immediately following an Acrobat/Reader auto-update; no other changes were made to the printer, Fiery server, or print server configuration.
No official advisory for this specific regression was found on Adobe's Known and Fixed Issues page as of this report.Summary
PDF documents containing mixed page sizes (8.5x11 and 11x17) fail to print correctly after a recent Acrobat/Reader update. Pages sized 11x17 fail with a PostScript interpreter error on the print device; the same 11x17 content prints successfully when extracted into its own single-size PDF. Rolling back Acrobat/Reader to a prior version on the affected server fully resolved the issue with no further errors.
Environment
Product: Adobe Acrobat / Acrobat Reader (please confirm exact product — Pro/Reader/DC — via Help > About)
Affected version: Believed to be 26.001.21771 (planned update dated Aug 1, 2026) — please confirm via Help >…2 votes -
Remove AI and clean up your feature request / bug reports
Remove AI. Also, actually look at your feature requests and bug reports. There are odd submissions for dating sites, fps hacks, and a bunch of other suspicious activity that does not belong here. Also, please remove AI. If you want me to use AI, I will and will stop using adobe. I bet ChatGPT can make me a better PDF than whatever garbage acrobat is doing.
13 votes -
Remove internal ads from paid version of Acrobat
Can we please have a debloated home screen in Adobe Acrobat?
Looking at the current layout, half the screen is wasted on stuff I’ll never use:
• Curated project ads like “Unlock your sales potential with TED” — this isn’t why I opened Acrobat.
• AI features pushing “summarize your notes” when all I want is to view and edit PDFs.
• Meeting transcription integration — how is this even related to a PDF tool?And the strangest part: if I’m running Acrobat DC (formerly Acrobat Pro, Acrobat X, etc.), that already means I’m a paying customer. Why is the home screen still trying to upsell me with irrelevant promos?
All of this clutters the interface and makes the actual purpose of Acrobat harder to reach. A Publisher Mode without ads, promos, or unrelated features would make Acrobat far more usable.
Can we please have a debloated home screen in Adobe Acrobat?
Looking at the current layout, half the screen is wasted on stuff I’ll never use:
• Curated project ads like “Unlock your sales potential with TED” — this isn’t why I opened Acrobat.
• AI features pushing “summarize your notes” when all I want is to view and edit PDFs.
• Meeting transcription integration — how is this even related to a PDF tool?And the strangest part: if I’m running Acrobat DC (formerly Acrobat Pro, Acrobat X, etc.), that already means I’m a paying customer. Why is the…
23 votes -
Administrative Control to Disable the "Disable New Acrobat" Option
Many organizations standardize on the new Acrobat experience for supportability, training, documentation, and user consistency. While administrators can deploy the new Acrobat interface, end users are still able to select "Disable New Acrobat" from the menu and revert to the classic interface.
This creates several challenges:
- Increased support calls due to users working in different interfaces.
- Inconsistent user experience across the organization.
- Training documentation and internal procedures no longer match what users see.
- Additional administrative overhead when troubleshooting issues.Requested Enhancement
Please provide administrators with a policy or enterprise setting that allows them to:
- Disable or gray out the "Disable New Acrobat" menu option.
- Force users to remain on the new Acrobat experience.
- Control this setting through enterprise management tools such as Group Policy, registry settings, Microsoft Intune, or the Adobe Customization Wizard/Admin Console.This capability would allow organizations to standardize on a single Acrobat experience, reduce support costs, and ensure a consistent user experience across managed devices.
Many organizations standardize on the new Acrobat experience for supportability, training, documentation, and user consistency. While administrators can deploy the new Acrobat interface, end users are still able to select "Disable New Acrobat" from the menu and revert to the classic interface.
This creates several challenges:
- Increased support calls due to users working in different interfaces.
- Inconsistent user experience across the organization.
- Training documentation and internal procedures no longer match what users see.
- Additional administrative overhead when troubleshooting issues.Requested Enhancement
Please provide administrators with a policy or enterprise setting that allows them to:
- Disable…2 votes
- Don't see your idea?